Inclusive and Ethical International Relations

In the globalized world, international relations are of the utmost importance. In Stanfield’s view, international relations hinged on a balanced combination of politics, trade, and development initiatives. Though outside of the norm at the time, Stanfield looked beyond unilateral and bilateral trade relationships to support Canada’s future. Stanfield urged the importance of diversifying and broadening Canada’s international affairs: “the very fact is that so much of our trade is foreign trade – which limits our independence and increases our dependence upon developments outside of Canada and especially in the United States,”.^[2] As a reflection of this desire to develop all three dimensions of international relations, he travelled to China in his official capacity as Leader of the Opposition even before the federal government recognized the People’s Republic.^[3]

Though Stanfield supported efforts to diversify international trade partnerships, he recognized concerns about the effects of unfettered economic growth, both nationally and internationally.^[4] Stanfield addressed the environment, uneven development and poor living conditions when noting the need to take account of broader impacts associated with particular economic policies.^[5] Concerns regarding the ripple effects of economic growth towards the international community continue today. Further, Stanfield took a firm and principled stance regarding humanitarian interventions: regardless of political implications, actions must be taken to end human suffering.^[6] Stanfield’s considerations surrounding international relations hold more true today than forty years ago. As Canada continues to diversify its efforts on the international stage, decisions should account for the full range of impacts on politics, trade, and humanitarian development.